FringeLines · Post-conference read

Fal.Con vs Black Hat

The conversation, in pictures

Images from the most-engaged posts, one per author. Click to open the post.

What people talked about

Share of posts mentioning each topic (keyword match). Right column: gap in percentage points.

People who carried the conversation

Days are aligned to each event's opening day. Each column shows that day's total engagement and its top three authors. Shaded columns are event days. Hover or tap a face for details.

How much is it about AI?

Per post · keyword-based

Who's posting?

Function
Seniority

Other brands in the conversation

Share of each event's posts that mention the brand. Company names are matched in post text.

Top posts

#AuthorPostDateEngagement

What this means for FringeLines

Angles backed by the posts above
AI in GTM

"Everyone is an AI company now"

At Black Hat, buyers publicly said they couldn't tell vendors apart. One former CISO counted 165 of 307 booths mentioning AI, and 36 where he couldn't tell what the company did. Proving what the AI actually does is now the differentiator.

Black Hat
AI adoption · securing AI

Know your agents before you buy tools

The shared thread across both events: every AI agent needs an owner, a purpose, scoped permissions, and limits on what it can do without a human. Start agents where mistakes are cheap.

Fal.ConBlack Hat
AI in GTM

Copy-paste advocacy underperformed

20% of Fal.Con posts were templates, with a median of 9.5 engagements. Original posts by people outside CrowdStrike had a median of 28. Black Hat had no templates.

Fal.Con